<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
An update to my comment to this randform post<\/a>. In their latest publication the french authority for nuclear safety ASN<\/a> is declaring that concerning the accident<\/a> at the Tricastin nuclear power centre<\/a>:<\/p>\n Les derni\u00e8res mesures r\u00e9alis\u00e9es dans l\u2019environnement semblent indiquer un retour \u00e0 la normale pour la quasi-totalit\u00e9 des points surveill\u00e9s dans les eaux superficielles et les eaux de nappe. Deux points de mesure des eaux de nappe qui ont montr\u00e9 ou qui montrent des valeurs plus \u00e9lev\u00e9es que la valeur guide pr\u00e9conis\u00e9e par l\u2019OMS pour les eaux destin\u00e9es \u00e0 la consommation humaine retiennent l\u2019attention des experts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So “retour \u00e0 la normale” sounds as if everything is OK again – after the leakage. Unfortunately this is not the case. Besides some doubts about the official versions (for example an independent investigation of the organisation CRIIRAD<\/a> found atoms with a mass of 236 <\/a> which is probably Uran 236 and thus contradicting the statement that only natural uranium had been spilled (info via Schockwellenreiter)) one should note that the latency time for cancer due to incorporated radioactivity (the radiotoxicity of uranium as well as plutonium is is mainly due to alpha radiation and such it is mainly dangerous if incorporated) for bone, liver and kidney cancer approximately 20-30 years for Leukemia it is about 2-10 years. So higher cancer rates will probably be visible only after that times (if they are monitored at all?)<\/p>\n Still it seems that things could have been much much worse. I dont know what exactly is processed at Tricastin, but the fact that France’s fast breeder the Phenix<\/a> is much closer to the Tricastin site than to the site of the reprocessing plant at La Hague<\/a> and the fact that it seems that it was already discussed to built an EPR<\/a> at Tricastin, which as I explained here<\/a> and here<\/a> may burn MOX fuels (and thus also Plutonium) could mean that people were lucky that it was “just (unenriched) uranium” and not plutonium, which was spilled. Why? Because plutonium 239 has a specific activity which is about 180.000 times<\/em> bigger than uranium, as can be seen in this table by the University of Oldenburg.<\/a> Roughly means: If you incorporate the same amount of uranium 238 or plutonium 239 then plutonium is about 180.000 times more dangerous.<\/p>\n