<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaTeX + metafont</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randform.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randform.org/blog/?p=235</link>
	<description>blog on math, physics, art, and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: randform &#187; Blog Archive &#187; focus and context, part II: WYSIWYG versus WYChIWYG</title>
		<link>http://www.randform.org/blog/?p=235&#038;cpage=1#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>randform &#187; Blog Archive &#187; focus and context, part II: WYSIWYG versus WYChIWYG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randform.org/blog/?p=235#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>[...] In contrast to this WYChIWYG means that you see the possibilities but what you are going to get is not clear unless you choose the final outcome. In terms of shopping this means: if you went lets say hundred years ago into a mom-and-pop store in the western world and if you had the intention to by sugar then you would get sugar. Nowadays you will have to choose from at least 6 different sugar brands. Takes a lot of energy. Even more: In a new design paradigma you have even to choose the design of your product, means if you want a bike then often you can choose not only the brands but also the parts, form, function etc of the bike. This holds also true for the computer-WYChIWYG, i.e. if I type in &#8220;:)&#8221; then php can link this to basically everything you want: from freely designed round smilies to straight jackets (a bit exagerated  ) (see also LaTeX). Similar things hold for religion in modern worlds: Whereas in earlier times you had to live according to the religion of the place you lived in, you can nowadays choose what and even how you nourish your spirituality (if it exists). Even the development of democracies could be seen to fall under this trend. physics/math: quantum computers (also here. More on this maybe later). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast to this WYChIWYG means that you see the possibilities but what you are going to get is not clear unless you choose the final outcome. In terms of shopping this means: if you went lets say hundred years ago into a mom-and-pop store in the western world and if you had the intention to by sugar then you would get sugar. Nowadays you will have to choose from at least 6 different sugar brands. Takes a lot of energy. Even more: In a new design paradigma you have even to choose the design of your product, means if you want a bike then often you can choose not only the brands but also the parts, form, function etc of the bike. This holds also true for the computer-WYChIWYG, i.e. if I type in &#8220;:)&#8221; then php can link this to basically everything you want: from freely designed round smilies to straight jackets (a bit exagerated  ) (see also LaTeX). Similar things hold for religion in modern worlds: Whereas in earlier times you had to live according to the religion of the place you lived in, you can nowadays choose what and even how you nourish your spirituality (if it exists). Even the development of democracies could be seen to fall under this trend. physics/math: quantum computers (also here. More on this maybe later). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
